77
77
Aug 15, 2013
08/13
by
FBC
tv
eye 77
favorite 0
quote 0
what the nsa is doing is trying to find a reason to put new jail. neil: they can take leaps with that and share that with a lot of folks, that we never intended to happen. katherine thank you very much. now to lawyer who is livid. rebecca rose woodland said that by breaking into your e-mails is breaking the law. rebecca. google says no, this is all part of what you sign up for as a g-mail user, and as a g-mail receiver. >> how can a g-mail receiver sign up anything? neil: apparently, when you open that e-mail, you become vulnerable. >> and i knew? did you know. first of all you don't distinguish where it is from, you don't accept the terms with every e-mail does a come a question, do you accept the terms of that g-mail user's account, they don't get that, if that i want to take my information, aol users all net thrown out to every e-mail user, if they want to save it they can touch my e-mail, i'm not on g-mail, say i'm on also, they have to -- aol, they have to ask me if i want to give up my privacy rights, they are taking the supreme court cas case
what the nsa is doing is trying to find a reason to put new jail. neil: they can take leaps with that and share that with a lot of folks, that we never intended to happen. katherine thank you very much. now to lawyer who is livid. rebecca rose woodland said that by breaking into your e-mails is breaking the law. rebecca. google says no, this is all part of what you sign up for as a g-mail user, and as a g-mail receiver. >> how can a g-mail receiver sign up anything? neil: apparently, when...
63
63
Aug 10, 2013
08/13
by
FBC
tv
eye 63
favorite 0
quote 0
so if we are looking for this to be a reflection of a more open nsa we have another think coming. >> this is out a move toward transparency. this makes it harder to tell what is going o what is funny, the nsa director gave a speech that as cyber security conference this week. he ended it by saying if you guys -- you should make up your mind and get all the facts yourself. which would be great if they would give us the facts, but what uc was moves like this to ordeto increase their own lack of transparency, their own internal protections to make sure that there perssion cannot give up, what you see is they're making moves to ensure you connecticut information. neil: i called that. a very astute observation. you are not telling us the facts. it is very hard. forget it. thank you very much. meanwhile, no surprise, the president would be doing a little behind the scenes palin. privately with big technology executives. we are told it will put their minds at ease. no one is talking about what is happening at thi meeting of what is said, not exactly putting my next guests mind that these. a
so if we are looking for this to be a reflection of a more open nsa we have another think coming. >> this is out a move toward transparency. this makes it harder to tell what is going o what is funny, the nsa director gave a speech that as cyber security conference this week. he ended it by saying if you guys -- you should make up your mind and get all the facts yourself. which would be great if they would give us the facts, but what uc was moves like this to ordeto increase their own...
71
71
Aug 18, 2013
08/13
by
FBC
tv
eye 71
favorite 0
quote 0
with the nsa demands in a speech read what anyone else would call ridiculous. hundreds of cases of supposedly unintended interception of u.s. e-mail and phone calls and typographical errors that prompted overly aggressive searches. this group for one thing, not responding to them or even reporting them is quite another. it's not only sloppy but illegal and now we come to find that the smartest intligence surveillance court that is supposed to keep an eye on them to not even learn about some of these violations until months after the fact willing among constitutional which is kind of like locking the barn door after all the animals left. my friends, step back and ponder the sheer magnitude of what is going on. only a couple of months ago deputy attorney general praise the extensive safeguards put in place to make short spies to not run amok. remember well. every now and then there may be a mistake. the deputag must have the very different understanding of now and then. to me that means maybe once a twice. to him it means more like thousand of 2000. either that w
with the nsa demands in a speech read what anyone else would call ridiculous. hundreds of cases of supposedly unintended interception of u.s. e-mail and phone calls and typographical errors that prompted overly aggressive searches. this group for one thing, not responding to them or even reporting them is quite another. it's not only sloppy but illegal and now we come to find that the smartest intligence surveillance court that is supposed to keep an eye on them to not even learn about some of...
149
149
Aug 21, 2013
08/13
by
FBC
tv
eye 149
favorite 0
quote 0
neil: you are not going to believe this, new details about nsa snooping scandal, we're hearing that nsa actually has capacity to do a lot more spying than we thought, it is reach 75% of all internet traffic. think about that. in some cases, earnin even recog content of e-mails not just the top line. the entire e-mail. all right that is a lot more pervasive and invasive than ever originally thought. so when they are scooping this stuff up, not just want to line they are getting, they have the ability to get the whole e-mail. 75% of all the crisscross of internet traffic. wow. one of the names for these programs, blarney, i'll leave it at that. they say two are not connected that verizon landed a $10 billion contract with the government because it was -- well the best suited candidate for the job, not because it handed north of 115 million of its customer phone records to the government as due course. hard to say this is not government watch dog, katherine said that does not sit right, sending a signal this is all wrong, you help uncle sam you make money, you don't help uncle sam, you don
neil: you are not going to believe this, new details about nsa snooping scandal, we're hearing that nsa actually has capacity to do a lot more spying than we thought, it is reach 75% of all internet traffic. think about that. in some cases, earnin even recog content of e-mails not just the top line. the entire e-mail. all right that is a lot more pervasive and invasive than ever originally thought. so when they are scooping this stuff up, not just want to line they are getting, they have the...
58
58
Aug 16, 2013
08/13
by
FBC
tv
eye 58
favorite 0
quote 0
apparently you need not be an open book, and therere ways around the nsa. who knew? i started getting all these e-mails from viewers to tell me we need not take this surveiling digital forensic analyst on how we give the fed defender. all perfectly legal. good to have you. i guess the key is just making sure that our accounts are not accessible. have you do that? >> two things. in the immediate term andong term. you have to recognize that the free and sheep service, these are not going to protect your privacy, everything you send on them and use them as an open book. so that you just need to accept. what you can do is use alternative messaging services. they do cost money, but they will increase your messages and data. i think it's important for two reasons. in the short term you protect the information, especially if your lawyer or a cow or a business person and keep the data private. neil: you are a genius. i am not. what does this mean? >> that protect the security of the law in of your mailbox. they offer this. they send the code to your phone. you also enter the
apparently you need not be an open book, and therere ways around the nsa. who knew? i started getting all these e-mails from viewers to tell me we need not take this surveiling digital forensic analyst on how we give the fed defender. all perfectly legal. good to have you. i guess the key is just making sure that our accounts are not accessible. have you do that? >> two things. in the immediate term andong term. you have to recognize that the free and sheep service, these are not going to...
155
155
Aug 5, 2013
08/13
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 155
favorite 0
quote 0
that's what nsa does. its sole purpose is to get intelligence to protect americans from attack. >> with we did not have this programs we wouldn't be able to listen in on the bad guys. >> neil: this is just -- using a terror threat to run roughshod over common sense and our constitution. and by the way, patrick to your point, as if we know these programs were responsible for any of the information we have. >> no, no. the taking -- i need to come back to what you just said about the american future fund. anything something i talk about yesterday. bob bauer, the obama campaign lawyer, is the one who instituted this at the fecfec staff went to lois learner, lois lane lerner. he ended up as the irs chief counsel. on the stuff on the nsa -- this is part of the same attack on american democracy, we have people getting up here with these canards saying, look at our program, we got all this information. it had nothing do do with the 300 millions americans whose records they're taking. the nsa is supposed to be list
that's what nsa does. its sole purpose is to get intelligence to protect americans from attack. >> with we did not have this programs we wouldn't be able to listen in on the bad guys. >> neil: this is just -- using a terror threat to run roughshod over common sense and our constitution. and by the way, patrick to your point, as if we know these programs were responsible for any of the information we have. >> no, no. the taking -- i need to come back to what you just said about...
78
78
Aug 14, 2013
08/13
by
FBC
tv
eye 78
favorite 0
quote 0
i believe he was in favor of what nsa was doing this operation -- >> you saying he knew? >> i say i find it difficult to believe as an american citizen he did not a clue at extend of what they are doing, he is our commander in chief, he is in charge. iin my mind, how many committees are worth while? >> that is what i was thinking, commissions and their work pile up largely ignored. >> you are putting james clapper in charge of investigating james clapper, he is in charge of investigating -- >> you find that odd? >> bizarre, and i watch that press conference, it was a great defense of obamacare, but a horrible defense of this. because, you are right. no president wants to have another 9/11 on their watch. nobody. they will go to whatever measures they will go to to prevent it from happening, i think measures are way too extreme. i'm not comfortable them. i am opposed to it. it has gone wayyoverboard, so, my attitude is, don't have another commission, you know what you are doing, you don't need t to investigate it, clappr investigating clap ser really clapper is really stup
i believe he was in favor of what nsa was doing this operation -- >> you saying he knew? >> i say i find it difficult to believe as an american citizen he did not a clue at extend of what they are doing, he is our commander in chief, he is in charge. iin my mind, how many committees are worth while? >> that is what i was thinking, commissions and their work pile up largely ignored. >> you are putting james clapper in charge of investigating james clapper, he is in charge...